Linguistic Properties Matter for Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition: Combining Semantic Interaction, Topic Continuity and Attribution
نویسندگان
چکیده
Modern solutions for implicit discourse relation recognition largely build universal models to classify all of the different types of discourse relations. In contrast to such learning models, we build our model from first principles, analyzing the linguistic properties of the individual top-level Penn Discourse Treebank (PDTB) styled implicit discourse relations: Comparison, Contingency and Expansion. We find semantic characteristics of each relation type and two cohesion devices – topic continuity and attribution – work together to contribute such linguistic properties. We encode those properties as complex features and feed them into a Naı̈ve Bayes classifier, bettering baselines (including deep neural network ones) to achieve a new state-of-the-art performance level. Over a strong, feature-based baseline, our system outperforms oneversus-other binary classification by 4.83% for Comparison relation, 3.94% for Contingency and 2.22% for four-way clas-
منابع مشابه
Intentionality In A Topical Approach Of Discourse Structure
The alternative to be outlined provides a proposal to solve a central problem in research on discourse structure and discourse coherence, namely, as pointed out by many authors, that of the relationship between linguistic and intentional structure, or, in other words, between subject matter and presentational relations (Mann and Thompson 1988) or informational and intentional relations (Moore a...
متن کاملRecognizing Implicit Discourse Relations through Abductive Reasoning with Large-scale Lexical Knowledge
Discourse relation recognition is the task of identifying the semantic relationships between textual units. Conventional approaches to discourse relation recognition exploit surface information and syntactic information as machine learning features. However, the performance of these models is severely limited for implicit discourse relation recognition. In this paper, we propose an abductive th...
متن کاملSWIM: A Simple Word Interaction Model for Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition
Capturing the semantic interaction of pairs of words across arguments and proper argument representation are both crucial issues in implicit discourse relation recognition. The current state-ofthe-art represents arguments as distributional vectors that are computed via bi-directional Long Short-Term Memory networks (BiLSTMs), known to have significant model complexity. In contrast, we demonstra...
متن کاملSense Annotation in the Penn Discourse Treebank
An important aspect of discourse understanding and generation involves the recognition and processing of discourse relations. These are conveyed by discourse connectives, i.e., lexical items like because and as a result or implicit connectives expressing an inferred discourse relation. The Penn Discourse TreeBank (PDTB) provides annotations of the argument structure, attribution and semantics o...
متن کاملImplicit Causality, Negation, and Models of Discourse
Causality plays an important role in giving discourse its characteristic coherence. This paper examines how causality implicit in an utterance helps to organize dynamically constructed mental models of discourse. Experiments are reported suggesting that the linguistic form of utterances contributes significant semantic information about causality to a discourse representation. This view is cont...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2018